Skip to main content

Employer Should pay the wages by electronic credit



Employer Should  pay the wages by electronic credit

Traditionally the workmen, especially the contract workmen are paid wages in cash and in fact the Contract Labour Regulation Act requires that the Supervisor of the Principal Employer should be present to witness the payment of wages of the contract employees. This puts tremendous pressure and burden of liability on the Principal Employer and in the current scenario it is almost impracticable.

While many industries obtain authorisation from their workmen for payment of wages by cheque/electronic credit, the States like Maharasthra have long back made necessary amendments to the Payment of Wages Act. Recently, (Feb 2012), the Kerala Government has also amended Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act and issued direction to pay the wages only either by cheque or by crediting the amount in the bank account of the employees. Consequent to this amendment payment of salary by cash is withdrawn. The notification is appended.

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
Abstract
Labour & Rehabilitation Department – Payment of Wages Act 1936 – Payment of wages in
private sector- Payment either by cheque or crediting in Bank Account of the employees
concerned –Orders issued.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LABOUR & REHABILITATION (E) DEPARTMENT
G.O.(Ms) No.26/12/LBR Dated, Thiruvananthapuram, 16/02/2012.
ORDER
It has come to the notice of the Government that some of the employers in the private
sector of the State refuses minimum wages to their employees by issuing wage slips not on par
with the actual wages paid, causing much extortion.

Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 contemplates for the payment of wages in
the form of currency notes or coins. There is a proviso also under the aforementioned section
to pay the wages either by cheque or by crediting the wages in the bank account of the
employee concerned.

In the above circumstances, Government are pleased to order that all the employers in
the private sector of the State shall pay the wages either by cheque or by crediting the same in
the bank account of the employees concerned hereafter to arrest the alleged extortion in
prevalence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY MODEL BYE LAWS 1 TO 100

MODEL BYE – LAWS OF COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (Tenant Co‐Partnership Housing Society ) 2014 1 I.PRELIMINARY 3 a. The Name of the Society bye Law no 1. a 3 c. The Society is classification bye Law no 1. c 3 a. The registered address of the Society bye Law no 2. a 3 II. INTERPRETATIONS BY E LAW NO 3 3 III. AREA OF OPERATION BYE LAW NO 4 6 IV. OBJECTS 7 5. The objects of the Society bye Law no 5 7 V. AFFILIATION BYE LAW NO 6 7 VI. FUNDS, THEIR UTILISATION AND INVESTMENT 7 ( A ) Raising of Funds bye law no 7 7 (B)Share Capital bye law no 8 8 (C) Limit of Liabilities bye law no 11 8 (D) Constitution of the Reserve Fund bye Law no 12 8 (E) Creation of Other Funds bye law no 13 a. b. c. d. 9 b. Major Repairs Funds bye law no 13 b. 9 (F) Utilisation of the Funds by the Society bye law no 14 9 a. Reserve Fund bye law no 14 a 9 b. Repairs and Maintenance Fund bye law no 14 b 9 c. Sinking Fund bye law no 14 c 9 (G) Investment of Funds

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of

Mere Abusive Language not a serious misconduct to inflict capital punishment - Madras High Court in Worker vs Hindustan Unilever Limited

Important Points: Alleged Misconduct: The Worker barged into the shop floor, where the Production Manager and H.R.Executives were holding a meeting with the operators of Hassia Machine;  b) he disrupted the meeting and started abusive language against the Executives and the Manager and scolded the Executive by name Sundaram in a filthy language and c) he also intimidated him by holding him by his shift collar, thereby created an unpleasant atmosphere Long ago, there was prior incident of misconduct. HC's View and reference to series of judgements: - Use of abusive language by itself cannot constitute a serious misconduct fit for capital punishment - The context and the provocations to be borne in mind while determining the punishment - The Class of the work-men and the abuse to be considered from the level where he came from    and also the time lapse which can unwound the harm if any caused - Consider the age of workmen, duration of the dispute  and the feasibility of he getting e