Skip to main content

FAQ on Myths and Realities of Industrial Relation (IR) Code 2020 - Ministry of Labour & Employment

 FAQ on Myths and Realities of Industrial Relation (IR) Code 2020

Q 1. Whether the Industrial Relation Code in any way takes back workers’ right relating

to form trade unions?

Ans : No. The apprehension is totally incorrect. Provisions related to registration of

trade union have been retained under Chapter-III of IR Code 2020.

Q 2. Whether IR Code bans all strikes?

Ans : No. The Industrial Relations (IR) Code, 2020 does not ban strikes. Right to strike

remains intact under IR Code with mandatory 14 days notice period before going on

strike.

Q 3. Whether the worker will need government permission to go on strike in IR Code?

Ans : No permission is required from the Government under the IR Code. However,

14-Days prior strike notice will be required which will facilitate both employer and union

for immediate resolution of their dispute through timely conciliation leading to reduced

their conflict.

Q 4. Whether IR Code allows employers to retrench workers freely?

Ans : No. The provisions for mandatory one month notice and retrenchment

compensation continue to exist. Prior permission will be required for retrenchment by

establishments having 300 or more workers.

Q 5. Is it true that trade unions lose their grievance redressal role?

Ans : No. It is not true. Instead Trade Unions get statutory backing in the form of

negotiating union/negotiating council under the code thereby strengthening their

collective bargaining. The code also provides for bipartite forums like Works

Committee and Grievance Redressal Committee, having equal representation will

facilitate time bound redressal of grievances of workers.

Q 6. Whether, the Code ends job security for permanent workers and promotes hire

and fire?

Ans : No. The workers rights and job security remain protected in the IR Code with

provisions for mandatory one month notice and retrenchment compensation. Prior

permission will be required for retrenchment by establishments having 300 or more

workers

Q 7. Is it true that Fixed-Term Employment (FTE) is exploitative?

Ans : No. Fixed Term Employees will be eligible for all benefits (EPF, ESI, flexible

working hours, timely and minimum wages) equal to permanent employees. They will

also be eligible for Gratuity on completion of one year of service. This will reduce

contractualisation. Fixed Term Employee will get appointment letter directly from the

employer enhancing their pride. This will also increase their employability as freshers

can gain experience in a short span of time and enhance specialized skills.

Q 8. Whether the new provisions under IR Code will allow the employers with less

than 300 workers to fire without restriction?


Ans : No. The requirement for mandatory one month notice and retrenchment

compensation for every completed year of service continue. Prior permission will be

required for retrenchment by establishments having 300 or more workers. Also,

additional provision of re-skilling fund for retrenched workers to enhance their skills to

get better job perspective has been introduced for the welfare of the worker.

Q 9. Whether the conciliation mechanism is abolished under IR Code?

Ans : No. Rather, the conciliation mechanism have been streamlined and conciliation

is now made compulsory in all strike notice and conciliation proceeding shall be

commenced on the 1

st meeting of conciliation. Fixed time-line, digital process and clear

jurisdiction will now facilitate for faster settlement of disputes.

Q 10. Is it true that Labour Courts are being abolished?

Ans : The Labour Courts and Industrial Tribunals will be replaced with a simplified

two-tier tribunal system reducing delays and multiplicity of forums. Instead of one

member the IR Code has introduced two member Tribunals for speedy delivery of

justice.

Q 11. Is it true that workers cannot collectively bargain or protest?

Ans : No. Mandatory recognition of a sole negotiating union/council strengthens

structured bargaining by the workers with their employer.

Q 12. Is it true that Industry closure no longer needs approval?

Ans : Lay-off/Retrenchment/Closure have been well regulated under IR Code.

Industries having 300 workers on any day of previous year will need prior permission

from the Government. All benefits such as retrenchment compensation, priority in reemployment, etc. have been kept under IR Code.

Q 13. Is it true that workers’ participation in management is removed?

Ans : Workers’ participation have been ensured through Bipartite forums such as

Works Committees and Grievance Redressal Committees under the IR Code.

Q 14. Whether penalty provision for employer violations in IR Code are removed?

Ans : No. Penal provisions are not compromised instead penalties have been

substantially increased and made commensurate with the offences.

Q 15. Is it correct that IR Code centralizes all labour powers?

Ans : No. “Labour” is a concurrent subject under the Constitution of India and its

jurisdiction is clearly defined in the codes. The State governments are appropriate

government under all the four Labour Codes and they have to exercise their power as

appropriate government.

Q 16. Whether abolition of Labour Courts will delay the workers justice?

Ans : No. With the provision of 2 member Industrial Tribunal, the justice will be speedily

delivered.

Q 17. Whether the Code favours employers only?

Ans : No. The code protects the interest of workers through the provisions of

negotiating unions/councils, works committee, Grievance redressal committee,

requisite safeguards before retrenchment/lay-off and closure and effective dispute

resolution mechanism.

Q 18. Whether sales promotion employees are not treated as “employees” and

therefore not entitled to labour protections?

Ans : No. The sales promotion employees are legally recognized under the definition

of ‘worker’ under the IR code.

Q 19. Is it true that the “Journalists” are freelancers and therefore not “employees”?

Ans : “Working Journalist” employed in a newspaper/agency have now been included

under the definition of worker under the IR Code.

***

As published by the  Ministry of Labour & Employment

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of ...

MCS ACT: Encroachment /usage of Common Area by Flat Owners - Highlights of bye laws and the role of MC/General Body

The Managing Committee has to read the bye laws in harmony and adopt a standard process as approved by the General Body   Almost Every Society has conflicts or even fist fights on usage of common areas, especially the parking, the passage outside the flats and other areas meant for east of movement and common utility. As a Building lay out, and common areas differ accordingly to the size/class of buildings and also the category of flats , it is essential to review the relevant bye laws and formulate a policy with uniform norms and permitting fair use. What is permissible and fair use again depends on the unique size and design of a building, it is imperative to evolve a robust policy post deliberations at a General Body of Members.  Bye Law No 165. Penalties for breaches  Bye Law No 165(a)  The meeting of the General Body of the Society may prescribe penalties for different breaches of the Bye-laws of the Society. The Secretary of the Society, under instruct...

PoSH Act: ICC of the Employer of the Complainant (Victim) is also empowered to conduct enquiry -Path-breaking Ruling by the Hon'ble Supreme Court

 KEY POINTS BY LAWSHASTRA - FULL JUDGEMENT APPENDED BELOW   This path-breaking judgement by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, has well enunciated the objectives of the VISHAKA Guidelines and the PoSH Act, while spelling out the jurisdictional aspects of the “Employer” Crystal clear.  Precisely, the jurisdictional challenge by the Appellant in the present case, inter alia relates to whether the Internal Complaints Committee (hereinafter referred to as “ICC”) constituted at a certain Department of the Government of India can entertain a complaint under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “POSH Act”) against the Appellant who was working at a different Department of the Government of India at the relevant time.  Key Points for reference   PoSH Act. (extracts) Section 2(a)  “(a) “aggrieved woman” means -  in relation to a workplace, a woman, of any age whether employed or n...