Central Government to consider revision of wage ceiling under the Employees Provident Act - Basis Writ filed before Supreme Court

-

 ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.3 SECTION PIL-W

 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1134/2025

NAVEEN PRAKASH NAUTIYAL Petitioner(s)

 VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION IA No. 326773/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL

DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date : 05-01-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI

 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv.

 Ms. Neha Rathi, AOR

 Mr. Anurag Tiwary, Adv.

 Ms. Somya Kumari, Adv.

 Ms. Kajal Giri, Adv.

 Mr. Vishal Sinha, Adv.


For Respondent(s) : Mr. Harshit Manwani, Adv.

Mr. Siddharth, AOR


 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

 O R D E R

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article

32 of the Constitution seeking following reliefs :

“a. Issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus, or

any other appropriate writ, order or

direction, directing the Respondents to

immediately revise the existing wage

ceiling of Rs.15,000, which has remained

unchanged since 2014, in accordance with

the recommendations made by the SubCommittee on Enhancing Coverage and

Managing Related Litigation, as approved by

the Central Board of Trustees of EPFO in

July 2022;

b. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other

appropriate writ, order or direction,

directing the Respondents to consider and

implement a dynamic formula or objective

criteria for future revisions of the wage

ceiling under the Employees Provident Fund

Scheme;

c. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or

any other Writ/Orders/Directions directing

the Respondents to notify a mandatory

mechanism for annual periodic revision of

the wage ceiling under Paragraph 2(f) of

the employees Provident Scheme, 1952, in

line with relevant economic indicators such

as minimum wages, inflation, Consumer Price

Index, Income Tax exemption thresholds, and

per capita Net National Income;

2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we find

that issue requires active consideration by the Union of India to

address the grievance as posed in the grounds mentioned in this

petition. However, at this stage, we are not entertaining the

petition and relegate the petitioner to file a representation

before the appropriate authority within a period of two weeks and

place the order of this Court passed today before the said

authority. On receiving such representation, the authority shall

place the matter at appropriate level and take a decision in

accordance with law within a period of four months.

3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR)

 DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

-
MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of ...
Read more

MCS ACT: Encroachment /usage of Common Area by Flat Owners - Highlights of bye laws and the role of MC/General Body

-
The Managing Committee has to read the bye laws in harmony and adopt a standard process as approved by the General Body   Almost Every Society has conflicts or even fist fights on usage of common areas, especially the parking, the passage outside the flats and other areas meant for east of movement and common utility. As a Building lay out, and common areas differ accordingly to the size/class of buildings and also the category of flats , it is essential to review the relevant bye laws and formulate a policy with uniform norms and permitting fair use. What is permissible and fair use again depends on the unique size and design of a building, it is imperative to evolve a robust policy post deliberations at a General Body of Members.  Bye Law No 165. Penalties for breaches  Bye Law No 165(a)  The meeting of the General Body of the Society may prescribe penalties for different breaches of the Bye-laws of the Society. The Secretary of the Society, under instruct...
Read more