Skip to main content

Corporate Governance & Gender Diversity

 

Corporate Governance & Gender Diversity

1.1 Gender Diversity and a safe workplace for women are essential attributes of Good Corporate Governance. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, shortly known as the PoSH Act was enacted to provide protection to all working women from organised and unorganised sectors alike, regardless of hierarchy.

1.2 The Genesis: The Supreme Court, while voicing its serious concerns on the sexual harassment faced by working women,   in the case of Vishaka & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [1997(7) SCC 323] reaffirmed that sexual harassment at workplace is a form of discrimination against women and provided a set of guidelines (known as VISHAKA Guidelines), to address this issue, pending enactment of suitable legislation.

2.0 The PoSH Act.

2.1 The PoSH Act (Act) mandates provision of safe, secure and enabling environment to every woman, irrespective of her age or employment status (other than domestic worker working at home), free from all forms of sexual harassment and mandates that

 

(1) No woman shall be subjected to sexual harassment at any workplace.


(2) The following circumstances, among other circumstances, if it occurs, or is present in relation to or connected with any act or behaviour of sexual harassment may amount to sexual harassment:—


(i) Implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment in her employment; or


(ii) Implied or explicit threat of detrimental treatment in her employment; or


(iii) Implied or explicit threat about her present or future employment status; or


(iv)  Interference with her work or creating an intimidating or offensive or hostile work
   environment for her; or


(v) Humiliating treatment likely to affect her health or safety.


 

2.2 Constitution of Internal Complaints Committee

Every employer of a workplace has to constitute a Committee known as the Internal Complaints Committee (IC). If the Employer has multiple offices, administrative units or establishments, it shall constitute ICs at such offices/administrative units. Employers/industry having less than 10 employees are classified as unorganized sector.

Composition

·         Not less than 2 members from amongst employees, preferably committed to the cause of women or who have had experience in social work or have legal knowledge

·         1 member from amongst NGO or associations committed to the cause of women or a person familiar with the issues relating to sexual harassment

Provided that at least ½ of the total Members so nominated shall be women

2.3 Constitution of Local Complaints Committee

The PoSH Act also provides for constitution of a Local Committee at district level, by the appropriate Government, to receive complaints of sexual harassment from establishments where the Internal Committee has not been constituted due to having less than ten workers, or if the complaint is against the employer himself.

2.4 Complaints – how to be made and the Redressal mechanism,

 

The manner of addressing a complaint and the Redressal mechanism, including an option for conciliation prior to initiation of inquiry into the complaint is dealt with in the PoSH Act. The most pressing concern that I have found is the lack of training on legal knowledge among the Internal Committee Members (IC) for conductiong of an inquiry. Members of IC are usually found unable to conduct inquiries or appreciate evidence or draft appropriate reports, or recommendations” Ms Rekha Sharma – Chair Person – National Commission for Women. It is recommended that the IC/LC Members train themselves and to go through the Handbook of Guidelines, published by the Ministry of Women & Child Development (WCD), https://wcd.nic.in/). The Ministry also has empanelled certain Institutions for imparting training programmes/workshops under the Act.

2.5 Inquiry into Complaint

 Section 11 of the PoSH Act, inter alia, provides that the Internal Committee or the Local Committee, as the case may be shall, where the respondent is an employee proceed to make inquiry into the complaint, in accordance with the provisions of the service rules applicable to the respondent (and where no such rules exist, in such manner as may be prescribed. The following illustration would guide the manner of inquiry into typical complaints:

(i)     By a woman employee of the Principal Employer/Contractor of the workplace against another employee employed by the workplace or even  against a walk in customer or visitor to the workplace

(ii)  By a woman be it an intern,  customer, visitor or common service personnel (e.g., house-keeping)  against any of the above categories of employees, employed or deployed at the workplace

In all the above situations the responsibility being on the employer of the workplace, needless to emphasize that it has to ensure compliance and it is their ICC that must investigate and provide recourse/relief to the aggrieved women, including interim measures.

There could be a situation where the respondent against whom the complaint is made is the employee of any other contractor/agency or institution, but the complained harassment occurred at the above work place, the ICC of that respondent who should initiate inquiry in the manner prescribed in the PoSH Act. However, the employer of the workplace is also equally responsible to ensure conduct of inquiry as by the ICC concerned and resolution in due course.

2.6 Dissemination of Information & Awareness

The PoSH Act, inter alia, requires the Employer to.

(a)   provide a safe working environment at the workplace which shall include safety from the persons coming into contact at the workplace

(b)   display at any conspicuous place in the workplace, the penal consequences of sexual harassments; and the order constituting, the Internal Committee under sub-section (1) of section 4;

(c)   organise workshops and awareness programmes at regular intervals for sensitising the employees with the provisions of the Act and orientation programmes for the members of the Internal Committee in the manner as may be prescribed;

(d)    provide necessary facilities to the Internal Committee or the Local Committee, as the case may be, for dealing with the complaint and conducting an inquiry;

(e)   assist  in securing the attendance of respondent and witnesses before the Internal Committee or the Local Committee, as the case may be;

(f)     make available such information to the Internal Committee or the Local Committee, as the case be, as it may require having regard to the complaint made under sub-section (1) of section 9;

(g)   provide assistance to the woman if she so chooses to file a complaint in relation to the offence under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or any other law for the time being in force;

(h)   cause to initiate action, under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or any other law for the time being in force, against the perpetrator, or if the aggrieved woman so desires, where the perpetrator is not an employee, in the workplace at which the incident of sexual harassment took place;

(i)     treat sexual harassment as a misconduct under the service rules and initiate action for such misconduct;

(j)     monitor the timely submission of reports by the Internal Committee.

 

2.7 Challenges posed in Implementation

While it may not be a challenge for an organization to establish Committee,  as per norms and effective implementation for its office based employees, it poses quite a challenge and riddle where the employees are field based, and has a complex structure of workforce with contractual manpower, and work from home (WFH) , as predominant at the current juncture.

The law applies to all establishments and personnel irrespective of whose payroll such employees are and mandates, inter alia, the responsibility to provide a safe working environment at the workplace, which shall include safety from the persons coming into contact at the workplace and provide assistance to the woman, if she so chooses to file complaint in relation to the offence under the Indian Penal Code, or any other law.  

 

3.0 SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2015

The Ministry of WCD, as an additional step towards making the workplaces safer for the women in the Private Sector and enhanced transparency in disclosure, had advised SEBI to include certain disclosures in the corporate governance norms for the listed companies. SEBI after consideration, as amended its LODR regulations, to provide for following disclosures by the listed companies

(1)   No of complaints filed during the financial year

(2)   No of complaints disposed off during the financial year

(3)    No of complaints pending as on end of the financial year

4.0 Key Judgments for reference. It is recommended that readers go through the relevant judgements to get the holistic perspective.

Sl No

Key Excerpts

Reference

1

Vishaka Guidelines to be taken seriously and not followed only in ritualistic manner; External Member of a Committee should have expertise in issues related to sexual harassment and mere qualification would not suffice

Ruchika Singh Chhabra v. Air France India and Anr. (2018 SCC Online Del 9340)

2

Any physical contact or advance would be sexual harassment provided it is made in the context of a sexually oriented behaviour. A mere accidental touch, even if unwelcome would not amount to sexual harassment. 

Shanta Kumar v. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CDIR) & Ors, Delhi High Court ((2018) 156 FLR 719)

3

Cross examination of witness cannot be denied to the respondent and emphasized the importance of adherence to principles of natural justice –applicable to complainant as well as respondent

Avinash Mishra v Union of India (Delhi High Court, 2014 (215) DLT 714)

4

Hostile and oppressive work environment can also constitute as sexual harassment, widening the scope of sexual harassment definition in the PoSH Act.

Gaurav Jain v. Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust and Ors. (2015 SCC OnLine Del 11026)

5

It is significant to highlight that in this matter, the High Court awarded Rs.25 lakhs as compensation to the complainant for loss of her reputation, emotional distress and deprivation of right to live with dignity. In addition, the HC awarded penalty of 50000/-INR on employer for not setting the IC.

Global Health Private Limited Vs. Local Complaints Committee, District Indore and others [Writ Petition No.22317 of 2017]

 

 

Conclusion:  

“The meaning and content of the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution of India are of sufficient amplitudes to encompass all facets of gender equality….”Late Chief Justice J.S. Verma, Supreme Court of India, Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan

 

Sexual harassment constitutes a gross violation of women's right to equality and dignity. It has its roots in patriarchy and its attendant perception that men are superior to women and that some forms of violence against women are acceptable. One of these is workplace sexual harassment, which views various forms of such harassment, as harmless and trivial. Often, it is excused as ‘natural’ male behaviour or ‘harmless flirtation’ which women enjoy. Contrary to these perceptions, it causes serious harm and is also a strong manifestation of sex discrimination at the workplace. Not only is it an infringement of the fundamental rights of a woman, under Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India “to practice any profession or to carry out any occupation, trade or business”; it erodes equality and puts the dignity and the physical and psychological well-being of workers at risk. This leads to poor productivity and a negative impact on lives and livelihoods. To further compound the matter, deep-rooted socio-cultural behavioural patterns, which create a gender hierarchy, tend to place responsibility on the victim, thereby increasing inequality in the workplace and in the society at large. It is important as well to ensure that the emphasis is on prevention rather than punitive action (Excerpts from the Handbook of Sexual Harassment at Workplace, Ministry of WCD).

The basic principles of prevention including mitigation of corporate risks and mitigation be best applied for implementation of the PoSH Act by the industry. Many reputed organizations has either a Code of Ethics Committee or a sub-committee of the Board of Directors. It would be prudent if such Committees review the overall PoSH compliance including specific cases reported and redressed as an agenda item and reports back overall compliance to the Board at regular periodicity. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY MODEL BYE LAWS 1 TO 100

MODEL BYE – LAWS OF COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (Tenant Co‐Partnership Housing Society ) 2014 1 I.PRELIMINARY 3 a. The Name of the Society bye Law no 1. a 3 c. The Society is classification bye Law no 1. c 3 a. The registered address of the Society bye Law no 2. a 3 II. INTERPRETATIONS BY E LAW NO 3 3 III. AREA OF OPERATION BYE LAW NO 4 6 IV. OBJECTS 7 5. The objects of the Society bye Law no 5 7 V. AFFILIATION BYE LAW NO 6 7 VI. FUNDS, THEIR UTILISATION AND INVESTMENT 7 ( A ) Raising of Funds bye law no 7 7 (B)Share Capital bye law no 8 8 (C) Limit of Liabilities bye law no 11 8 (D) Constitution of the Reserve Fund bye Law no 12 8 (E) Creation of Other Funds bye law no 13 a. b. c. d. 9 b. Major Repairs Funds bye law no 13 b. 9 (F) Utilisation of the Funds by the Society bye law no 14 9 a. Reserve Fund bye law no 14 a 9 b. Repairs and Maintenance Fund bye law no 14 b 9 c. Sinking Fund bye law no 14 c 9 (G) Investment of Funds

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of

Mere Abusive Language not a serious misconduct to inflict capital punishment - Madras High Court in Worker vs Hindustan Unilever Limited

Important Points: Alleged Misconduct: The Worker barged into the shop floor, where the Production Manager and H.R.Executives were holding a meeting with the operators of Hassia Machine;  b) he disrupted the meeting and started abusive language against the Executives and the Manager and scolded the Executive by name Sundaram in a filthy language and c) he also intimidated him by holding him by his shift collar, thereby created an unpleasant atmosphere Long ago, there was prior incident of misconduct. HC's View and reference to series of judgements: - Use of abusive language by itself cannot constitute a serious misconduct fit for capital punishment - The context and the provocations to be borne in mind while determining the punishment - The Class of the work-men and the abuse to be considered from the level where he came from    and also the time lapse which can unwound the harm if any caused - Consider the age of workmen, duration of the dispute  and the feasibility of he getting e