Skip to main content

RECKLESS SPLITTING OF WAGES INTO ALLOWANCES FOR EPF WILL COST DEARLY TO THE EMPLOYERS-- LLR


RECKLESS SPLITTING OF WAGES INTO ALLOWANCES FOR EPF WILL COST DEARLY TO THE EMPLOYERS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labour Law Reporter has been persistently warning the subscribers to adopt protective wage structure in view of the judgments of High Courts upholding all allowances except HRA will form part of basic wages for EPF contributions.  Now the Supreme Court in its judgment dated 28.2.2019 reported in 2019 LLR 399. has upheld the judgments of the High Courts.  An appeal by EPFO against judgment of Calcutta High Court has been accepted by the Supreme Court holding that special allowance will also form the part of wages for EPF contributions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            While issuing the appointment letters to the employees the employers' recklessness is found to be most shocking. The discrepancy with regard to the splitting of many allowances speaks volumes about the glaring irresponsibility. As a result of it, the employers are often caught in the dragnet of the PF authorities, who derive perverted pleasure in harassing them. It is seen that some employers split the wages into allowances without considering as to what for that allowance is given.

For instance, special allowance is invariably even by the employers, in addition to basic wages, but when questioned as what is the speciality for giving a special allowance, no valid clarification is offered.  

While coming across such anomalies the 'Labour Law Reporter' had been exhorting subscribers particular employers covered under the Employees' Provident Funds & MP Act, that these allowances can create problem for them since Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Madras High Courts have held that all the allowances other than house rent allowance would attract provident fund contributions. Despite that many employers have not cared to rectify. Now the Supreme Court has upheld the judgments of the above High Courts including that of Calcutta High Court holding that special allowance will attract provident fund contributions. This may lead to heavy financial liability in addition to interest, damages, even prosecutions and loss of face for the organisation. 

Hence, instead of recklessly adopting the wage structure of any other establishment, the employers must consider as to whether it would be excluded under the Employees' Provident Funds & MP Act for attracting contributions and also if there is any supporting justification.  Accordingly, the Labour Law Reporter in the interest of the subscribers cautions the employers to revise their wages structures particularly those who are covered under the Employees' Provident Funds & MP Act.

For full judgment visit : www.labourlawreporter.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of ...

MCS ACT: Encroachment /usage of Common Area by Flat Owners - Highlights of bye laws and the role of MC/General Body

The Managing Committee has to read the bye laws in harmony and adopt a standard process as approved by the General Body   Almost Every Society has conflicts or even fist fights on usage of common areas, especially the parking, the passage outside the flats and other areas meant for east of movement and common utility. As a Building lay out, and common areas differ accordingly to the size/class of buildings and also the category of flats , it is essential to review the relevant bye laws and formulate a policy with uniform norms and permitting fair use. What is permissible and fair use again depends on the unique size and design of a building, it is imperative to evolve a robust policy post deliberations at a General Body of Members.  Bye Law No 165. Penalties for breaches  Bye Law No 165(a)  The meeting of the General Body of the Society may prescribe penalties for different breaches of the Bye-laws of the Society. The Secretary of the Society, under instruct...

PoSH Act: ICC of the Employer of the Complainant (Victim) is also empowered to conduct enquiry -Path-breaking Ruling by the Hon'ble Supreme Court

 KEY POINTS BY LAWSHASTRA - FULL JUDGEMENT APPENDED BELOW   This path-breaking judgement by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, has well enunciated the objectives of the VISHAKA Guidelines and the PoSH Act, while spelling out the jurisdictional aspects of the “Employer” Crystal clear.  Precisely, the jurisdictional challenge by the Appellant in the present case, inter alia relates to whether the Internal Complaints Committee (hereinafter referred to as “ICC”) constituted at a certain Department of the Government of India can entertain a complaint under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “POSH Act”) against the Appellant who was working at a different Department of the Government of India at the relevant time.  Key Points for reference   PoSH Act. (extracts) Section 2(a)  “(a) “aggrieved woman” means -  in relation to a workplace, a woman, of any age whether employed or n...