Skip to main content

Fence Eating the Crops - Another Dushasana in the garb of School Head Master Exposed

i am dismayed to see this news where the HM exploiting an under privileged girl for his lust - Damn his perversion!

 



HC dismisses bail plea of school HM2

21.8.2015 (UNI) Equating a 50-year-old government school Head Master (HM) acting as dushasana (who disrobed Draupadi in Tamil epic Mahabharat), towards girl students and acting as Duriyodhana towards male students, the Madras High refused to grant bail to him following sexual harassment charges.
The Head Master, Mariya Louis, was arrested for sexually harassing a tenth standard girl student at Kangeyam in Tiruppur district of Tamil Nadu, about 450 km from here.
The charges against him was that he had sexually harassed the girl, who discontinued her studies due to her family's poor financial situation, while taking special tuition classes for her last month.
After the girl attempted self-immolation, police registered a case and arrested him, following which he approached the High Court seeking bail.
When the bail petition filed by the HM came up for hearing, Mr Justice S Vaidyanathan dismissed the petition saying, going by the facts, it was clear that the HM had acted as Duriyodhana by receiving apology letters from students and parents for the wrong acts done by male students and as dushasana towards female students.

Dismissing the petitioner's contention that the charges against him were false, Louis, the judge said records clearly showed that the HM's misbehaviour with the girl was the main reason for her suicide attempt, which was, however, thwarted by her brother, besides statements were given by the students and teachers of the school against him. UNI

Courtesy: West Law India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY MODEL BYE LAWS 1 TO 100

MODEL BYE – LAWS OF COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (Tenant Co‐Partnership Housing Society ) 2014 1 I.PRELIMINARY 3 a. The Name of the Society bye Law no 1. a 3 c. The Society is classification bye Law no 1. c 3 a. The registered address of the Society bye Law no 2. a 3 II. INTERPRETATIONS BY E LAW NO 3 3 III. AREA OF OPERATION BYE LAW NO 4 6 IV. OBJECTS 7 5. The objects of the Society bye Law no 5 7 V. AFFILIATION BYE LAW NO 6 7 VI. FUNDS, THEIR UTILISATION AND INVESTMENT 7 ( A ) Raising of Funds bye law no 7 7 (B)Share Capital bye law no 8 8 (C) Limit of Liabilities bye law no 11 8 (D) Constitution of the Reserve Fund bye Law no 12 8 (E) Creation of Other Funds bye law no 13 a. b. c. d. 9 b. Major Repairs Funds bye law no 13 b. 9 (F) Utilisation of the Funds by the Society bye law no 14 9 a. Reserve Fund bye law no 14 a 9 b. Repairs and Maintenance Fund bye law no 14 b 9 c. Sinking Fund bye law no 14 c 9 (G) Investment of Funds
Post a Comment
Read more

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of
Post a Comment
Read more

Mere Abusive Language not a serious misconduct to inflict capital punishment - Madras High Court in Worker vs Hindustan Unilever Limited

Important Points: Alleged Misconduct: The Worker barged into the shop floor, where the Production Manager and H.R.Executives were holding a meeting with the operators of Hassia Machine;  b) he disrupted the meeting and started abusive language against the Executives and the Manager and scolded the Executive by name Sundaram in a filthy language and c) he also intimidated him by holding him by his shift collar, thereby created an unpleasant atmosphere Long ago, there was prior incident of misconduct. HC's View and reference to series of judgements: - Use of abusive language by itself cannot constitute a serious misconduct fit for capital punishment - The context and the provocations to be borne in mind while determining the punishment - The Class of the work-men and the abuse to be considered from the level where he came from    and also the time lapse which can unwound the harm if any caused - Consider the age of workmen, duration of the dispute  and the feasibility of he getting e
Post a Comment
Read more