High Court fines Collector for dereliction in duty – delay in recovery of workmen’s compensation

-
High Court fines Collector for  dereliction in duty – delay in recovery of  workmen’s compensation



“If there is no harvesting of the crop, the crop rots in the field and becomes inedible, further the inflation is so high that the value of money deprecates day by day. The value of the money, which was awarded in the year 2010 has been reduced to a large extent on account of inflation. The rate of interest awarded does not commensurate with the high rate of inflation”

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
A writ petition was filed seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the District Magistrate, Lalitpur to comply with the order of the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation dated 8th April, 2010, by which a sum of Rs. 1,85,915.00 was awarded as compensation to the petitioner along with interest @ 10 per cent. Pursuant to the said award, a letter dated 19th February, 2011 was issued by the Commissioner to the Collector praying that the amount may be recovered from the Executive Engineer of the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., Lalitpur.
The High Court noted that the the petitioner, was made to run from pillar to post for justice and for recovery of the amount. That the Collector and his agents have adopted a very soft stand in recovering the amount from the respondent who is an instrumentality of the State. It took 15 months for the Collector to issue a citation and, in spite of the citation being issued, no effective measures were taken to recover the amount under the provisions of U.P. Z.A. & LR Act. Such lackadaisical attitude and practice adopted by the Collector is totally deprecated. It is a quite apparent that dual standards are being adopted for recovery of amount against instrumentalities of the State on one hand and against private persons on the other hand. The fact remains that the petitioner, who has an order in her favour is unable to reap the benefit of the award.
 A curious stand was adopted by the learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has not suffered for the delay in the recovery of the amount inasmuch as, up-to-date interest has been recovered from the Executive Engineer. In the opinion of the Court, the amount has to be recovered immediately so that the benefit can be reaped by the petitioner at the earliest. If there is no harvesting of the crop, the crop rots in the field and becomes inedible, further the inflation is so high that the value of money deprecates day by day. The value of the money, which was awarded in the year 2010 has been reduced to a large extent on account of inflation. The rate of interest awarded does not commensurate with the high rate of inflation.

While disposing the petition  since the amount has now been recovered and granting liberty to the petitioner to apply before the commissioner Workmen's Compensation for release of amount, the Court slapped a a cost of Rs. 20,000 each shall be paid by the Collector as well as by the Executive Engineer. 

Source: Labour Law Reporter 2013

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essentials of Resignation - test of voluntary resignation vis-a-vis fradulent or coercive document

-
  Essentials of valid resignation and acceptance, critical review   The whole industry, be it micro, small, medium, or large are operating either in virtual or near virtual web of process, right from recruitment to separation. However, the labour laws remain static despite introduction of labour codes few years ago. While the labour codes have brought out a series of simplifications and ease of process, fundamental principles on bare compliance and fair practices are essential for dispute free management of any organization. This brief analysis focusses on the essentials of a valid resignation process, in the light of ‘asked to resign’ dilution of the due diligence process while considering the resignation process. Be it a strong HR system or a bare minimum structure, the process remains to be mechanical with significant vagaries. While the instances of ‘asked to resign’ are clear cut grey area and an unfair practice even ordinary cases of voluntary resignations are re...
Read more

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

-
MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of ...
Read more