Skip to main content

Frequently Asked Questions on Fixed Term Contracts

 What is a Fixed Term Contract ?

Fixed Term Contract is a Contract of Employment for a fixed term/tenure between the employer and the employee/workman. This contract is adapted usually for meeting the ad-hoc requirement of the industry and also for non-core activities.

Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 regulates the engagement of labour under Contract in the establishments/industry and also provides the State/Central Government to prohibit contract labour in particular field of work/job or industry.    

·         What are the essential terms of a Fixed Term Contract?

 The length of the contract. 

A contract where the worker has worked for a year or more on the same job or where the contract has been renewed continuously would be an indication of the job being a permanent one. However this is subject to the type of work that is being done. Where a group of workers were employed for the specific job of crushing sugar during the crushing season and they were terminated at the end of the season despite having worked for 240 or more days, the contract was deemed to be a fixed term contract.

 Valid FTC


The key to having a valid fixed term contract would therefore appear to be that the contract must be genuinely for a temporary job that once completed will not require somebody else to be appointed for doing it further. The factors that go into the making of a valid fixed term contract would be :

After the conclusion of the contract if somebody else were hired to do the same job, it would lead to the suspicion of the job being permanent and the contract being a sham one.

Where seasonal or temporary workers were appointed to do a job, at the completion of the job their termination was deemed not to be a “retrenchment”.[1] This re-enforces the view that a fixed term contract is easily accepted for a short term or temporary job, but where the job is a very long one and needs a replacement in personnel after the completion, the termination can often be deemed to be retrenchment.

The procedures for termination as laid down in the fixed term contract must be adhered to carefully. In situations where the exact procedure was not laid down, the termination has been held to be void and amounting to retrenchment.

When adjudicating on this subject, the Court looks at the nature of the work done and not necessarily the contract that has been drawn up. Periodical renewal of contracts over a period of time gives rise to the assumption that the employment is permanent in nature and not by way of a fixed term contract. The Courts have also tried to check the wordings and form of contract to see whether the length of the term of the contract was in any way trying to camouflage the fact that the contract was actually a sham for what was in fact a period of permanent employment.


·         How to Terminate a Fixed Term Contract?
 

Under a fixed term contract of employment, termination of a worker can take place either through
(i)                  The termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non- renewal of the contract upon the expiry of the stipulated period of the contract or    Termination of the contract of employment in terms of a stipulation contained in the contract of employment i.e. through an active step taken under a termination clause in a contract.
  
The key to having a valid fixed term contract would therefore appear to be that the contract must be genuinely for a temporary job that once completed will not require somebody else to be appointed for doing it further. The factors that go into the making of a valid fixed term contract would be :
  

 ·         Will the termination of a workman engaged on fixed term amount retrenchment?
 

NO. Termination of a workman engaged on fixed term contract, on expiry of the contract or pursuant to the terms of the contract will not amount to retrenchment. Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act (ID Act) excludes such contracts from the purview of “retrenchment”. There are 4 exceptions to Section 2, dealing with retrenchment  

·         On the Voluntary retirement of a workman.
·         On retirement after the workman has reached the age of super-annuation.
·         On the termination of a workman as a result of a non-renewal of a contract of employment between the employer and the workman on the expiry of such a contract or termination under a stipulated clause in the contract and Termination on grounds of continued ill health.

       The Supreme Court in the case of Harmohinder Singh v kharagh canteen, Ambala reported in (2001) 5 SCC 540 has held that an employee’s services could be terminated on the basis of a stipulation in his contract fixing a particular tenure or period beyond which the employee would be discharged.      



       The Supreme Court in the case of Morinda Co-operative Sugar Mills v Ram Krishna reported in (1995) 5 SCC 653 has held that seasonal workers by their nature of employment would be covered under section 2(oo) (bb).               

       The Supreme Court in the case of Kishor Chandra Samal v Divisional Manager, Orissa State Cashew Development Corporation, reported in JT 2005 (10) SC 46   has held that even if there were repeated contracts issued for successive terms spread over several years, so long as each contract was for a fixed period, section 2(OO) (bb) would apply, and termination of employment would stand excluded from the definition of “retrenchment”.    

Also Read http://www.singhania.in/userfiles/India%20Legal%20Update%20Feb%202012.pdf. India Update on Downsizing, by Singhania & Partners' Journal.

 ·         What are the laws applicable for Contract Labour /Employees in the Industry?

In India several  labour laws regulate various conditions of work, wages, service, labour relations and other such related matter.  Some of the relevant laws in addition to the The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970;


  •  The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947;
  • The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act.
  • The Factories Act, 1948;
  • The Shops and Establishment Acts of various states;
  • The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970;
  • The Trade Unions Act, 1926;
  • The Employees' Compensation Act, 1923;
  • The Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952;
  •  The Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948;

What should be the Notice pay liability by the employer in case of termination of the FTC, by a stipulation in the said contract or otherwise!

The fixed term contract usually stipulates the notice period or payment in lieu of the notice by either party.
Though the employee/workmen shall be bound by the stipulation agreed to by virtue of this fixed term contract, such a condition should not be a one less favourable than a remedy provided by any law governing the employee workmen.  The Contractor/employee engaging the employee/workmen being an establishment under the Shops & Establishment Act, the respective S&E Act would govern the notice pay liability. As far Mahrasthra, Section 66 of the M S&E Act mandates a notice period or wages in lieu of such notice period -

(1) If an employer wants to terminate the services of any employee who has been in his continuous service employment for one year or more, the employer can terminate his services by giving him 30 days' notice in writing or wages in lieu of such notice.

(2) If an employer wants to terminate the services of any employee who has been in his continuous service employment for less than one year but more than three months, the employer can terminate his services by giving him 14 days' notice in writing or wages in lieu of such notice.

The  M S&E Act, while defining 'wages' adapts the definitions as in the Payment of Wages Act. Hence the wages for notice pay should encompass all the wages including such allowances, other than the allowances paid to defray special expenses (Please check this PW Act definitions for clarity.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY MODEL BYE LAWS 1 TO 100

MODEL BYE – LAWS OF COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (Tenant Co‐Partnership Housing Society ) 2014 1 I.PRELIMINARY 3 a. The Name of the Society bye Law no 1. a 3 c. The Society is classification bye Law no 1. c 3 a. The registered address of the Society bye Law no 2. a 3 II. INTERPRETATIONS BY E LAW NO 3 3 III. AREA OF OPERATION BYE LAW NO 4 6 IV. OBJECTS 7 5. The objects of the Society bye Law no 5 7 V. AFFILIATION BYE LAW NO 6 7 VI. FUNDS, THEIR UTILISATION AND INVESTMENT 7 ( A ) Raising of Funds bye law no 7 7 (B)Share Capital bye law no 8 8 (C) Limit of Liabilities bye law no 11 8 (D) Constitution of the Reserve Fund bye Law no 12 8 (E) Creation of Other Funds bye law no 13 a. b. c. d. 9 b. Major Repairs Funds bye law no 13 b. 9 (F) Utilisation of the Funds by the Society bye law no 14 9 a. Reserve Fund bye law no 14 a 9 b. Repairs and Maintenance Fund bye law no 14 b 9 c. Sinking Fund bye law no 14 c 9 (G) Investment of Funds

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of

Mere Abusive Language not a serious misconduct to inflict capital punishment - Madras High Court in Worker vs Hindustan Unilever Limited

Important Points: Alleged Misconduct: The Worker barged into the shop floor, where the Production Manager and H.R.Executives were holding a meeting with the operators of Hassia Machine;  b) he disrupted the meeting and started abusive language against the Executives and the Manager and scolded the Executive by name Sundaram in a filthy language and c) he also intimidated him by holding him by his shift collar, thereby created an unpleasant atmosphere Long ago, there was prior incident of misconduct. HC's View and reference to series of judgements: - Use of abusive language by itself cannot constitute a serious misconduct fit for capital punishment - The context and the provocations to be borne in mind while determining the punishment - The Class of the work-men and the abuse to be considered from the level where he came from    and also the time lapse which can unwound the harm if any caused - Consider the age of workmen, duration of the dispute  and the feasibility of he getting e