Skip to main content

Discontinuation of NEEM Scheme - Team Lease Education Foundation permitted to continue the scheme for existing students - Delhi High Court

Source: Labour Law Reporter Feb 23

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1589/2023 and CM APPL. 6039/2023

TEAM LEASE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Anil Soni (CGSC) with Mr.

Devvrat Yadav, Advocate for UOI.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

 07.02.2023

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner- Team Lease Education Foundation, a National

Employability Enhancement Scheme (NEEM) agent, who was recognised

by the Government of India, has challenged the impugned order dated 23rd

December, 2022 by which NEEM has been discontinued, with immediate

effect. The said order issued by the Technical Section-II, Department of

Higher Education, Ministry of Education and communicated to the

Chairman, All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) reads as:

Subject: National Employability Enhancement Scheme

(NEEM) - regarding

Sir, I am directed to refer to AICTE letter F. No. 3-

1/D-SDC/NEEM/2021 dated 11.08.2022 regarding

revised draft NEEM guidelines forwarded to the

Ministry for consideration and to convey that it has

been decided to discontinue the Scheme with

immediate effect.

2. In light of the above, AICTE is requested to close the

above scheme with immediate effect.

3. The Petitioner challenges the above decision of the Respondents to

discontinue the NEEM scheme and the resulting letter dated 23rd December,

2022.

4. The case of the Petitioner is that under the NEEM scheme, which was

notified on 15th April, 2013, in the Gazette of India, training is imparted to

students in various skills to enable them to secure employment. The purpose

of the NEEM Scheme is to facilitate upskilling and make Indian youth ready

for employment in various industries.

5. The case of the Petitioner is that in view of the impugned order/letter,

as per the Petitioner, more than 26,000 students who are receiving training

would be impacted. Considering the large scale impact of the impugned

letter dated 23rd December, 2022, Mr. Anil Soni, ld. Counsel would seek

instructions in the matter.

6. In the meantime, it is made clear that the Petitioner shall make no

fresh admissions. However, considering the fact that the NEEM Scheme has

been in operation for the last decade or so, the sudden stoppage of the

scheme could result in adverse impact on those who are already enrolled.

Accordingly, the students currently enrolled with the Petitioner shall

continue to receive the training as also any certifications that would

otherwise have been given to them under the NEEM Scheme.

7. The Court also directs a responsible official from the concerned

Ministry to remain present in Court on the next date of hearing.

8. List on 24th February, 2023.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

dj/am

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of ...

Regulatory Labour Law Compliances and PoSH

  Management Development Program (MDP) on Regulatory Labour Law Compliance • Chetana’s Institute of Management and Research (CIMR) organized a Management Development Program (MDP) on Regulatory Labour Law Compliance for Industrial Relations/Employee Relations Officers and HR Managers. The two-day program was held on December 10th and 11th, 2024. The MDP aimed to enhance participants' knowledge and practical application of labour law compliance and related tools. The program attracted nominations from five prominent manufacturing companies in Mumbai and Thane. Thus, the participants were senior officers responsible for compliance matters and 15 HR students from CIMR. Program Highlights • Dr. Madhumita Patil, CEO of CIMR and CRKIMR, inaugurated the program, emphasizing the importance of compliance to protect the workforce. • Mr. Vijay Padate, a distinguished expert and former Director of the Employer Federation of India, as well as a former member of EPFO and ESIC, provided a compre...

PoSH Act: ICC of the Employer of the Complainant (Victim) is also empowered to conduct enquiry -Path-breaking Ruling by the Hon'ble Supreme Court

 KEY POINTS BY LAWSHASTRA - FULL JUDGEMENT APPENDED BELOW   This path-breaking judgement by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, has well enunciated the objectives of the VISHAKA Guidelines and the PoSH Act, while spelling out the jurisdictional aspects of the “Employer” Crystal clear.  Precisely, the jurisdictional challenge by the Appellant in the present case, inter alia relates to whether the Internal Complaints Committee (hereinafter referred to as “ICC”) constituted at a certain Department of the Government of India can entertain a complaint under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “POSH Act”) against the Appellant who was working at a different Department of the Government of India at the relevant time.  Key Points for reference   PoSH Act. (extracts) Section 2(a)  “(a) “aggrieved woman” means -  in relation to a workplace, a woman, of any age whether employed or n...