Skip to main content

Minimum Wages - Supreme Court DIrects Payment of Minimum Wages as per its previous order - SC Order dated 8 Dec 2018

1
ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A.No.171266/2018 in SLP(C)No.26186/2018 @
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26185-26228/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-08-2018
in W.P.(C)Nos.8125/2016, 12088/2016, 2658/2017, 3360/2017, 3385/
2017, 3684/2017, 3792/2017, 3987/2017, 4007/2017, 4080/2017, 4102/
2017, 4103/2017, 4106/2017, 4446/2017, 4493/2017, 4867/2017, 4934/
2017, 4998/2017, 5013/2017, 5026/2017, 5199/2017, 5200/2017, 5214/
2017, 5217/2017, 5218/2017, 5753/2017, 5779/2017, 5933/2017, 6078/
2017, 6155/2017, 6794/2017, 6815/2017, 6841/2017, 6990/2017, 7012/
2017, 7141/2017, 7760/2017, 8229/2017, 8622/2017, 9099/2017, 9187/
2017, 9221/2017, 9446/2017 & 7495/2017 passed by the High Court Of
Delhi At New Delhi)
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
FLT LT. RAJAN DHALL CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS.ETC.ETC.Respondent(s)
(For clarification/direction)
Date : 07-12-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dushyant A. Dave,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,AOR
Ms. Neha Sangwan,Adv.
Ms. Mahima C. Shroff,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh,Sr.Adv.
No.9 Mr. S.K. Dubey,Adv.
Mr. K.V. Mohan,AOR
Mr. Parangat Pandey,Adv.
Mr. Prabhas Bajaj,Adv.
Mr. Raj mangal Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Udit Malik,Adv.
Mr. Dhruv Mehta,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Vipin Singhania,Adv.
Ms. Manjula Gupta,AOR
2
Mr. P.V. Surendranath,Sr.Adv.
Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran,Adv.
Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran,Adv.
No.10 Mr. Sunil Fernandes,AOR
Ms. Nupur Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Darpan Sachdeva,Adv.
Ms. Priyanshe Indra Sharma,Adv.
Mr. Bhuvanesh Sehgal,Adv.
No.14 Mr. H.S. Kohli,Adv.
Mr. Kush Chaturvedi,AOR
Mr. Devang Gautam,Adv.
Mr. Chiranjeev Kothari,Adv.
Mr. Vidushpat Singhania,Adv.
Mr. Parvinder Singh,Adv.
No.27 Mr. Anand Shankar Jha,AOR
Mr. Arpit Gupta,Adv.
No.41 Mr. Abhigya,AOR
Mr. KumarSumit,Adv.
Mr. Anuj Bhushan,Adv.
Mr. Amit Goel,Adv.
No.54 Mr. R. Chandrachud,AOR
Mr. R. Vasanth,Adv.
No.57 Mr. Sarojanand Jha,Adv.
Ms. Nandita Bajpai,Adv.
Mr. M.R. Shamshad,AOR
No.58 Mr. Raveen Rai,Adv.
For M/s. Khaitan & Co.,AOR
Delhi State Book- Mr. Vikas Kumar,Adv.
sellers & Pub.Ass. Mr. Manish Paliwal,Adv.
Mr. Dheeraj Singh,Adv.
Mr. Vaibhav Arora,Adv.
For M/s. Corporate Legal Partners,AOR
Mr. Harvinder Singh,adv.
Mr. Gagan Gupta,AOR
Mr. Sandeep Sharma,Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav,Adv.
Mr. Kapil Hans,Adv.
Mr. Robin Khokhar,AOR
Mr. Manu Beri,Adv.
Mrs. V.D. Khanna,AOR
Mr. N. Swaminathan,Adv.
3
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,adv.
Mr. V.N. Raghupathy,AOR
Mr. Abhishek Yadav,AOR
Mr. Vivek Kishore,AOR
Mr. Manish Malhotra,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
I.A.No.171266/2018 :
This application is for seeking directions including
one prayer for modification of order dated 31.10.2018. It
cannot be entertained at this stage. Let this application
be listed along with the main matter.
I.A.No.169755/2018 :
This application shall also be listed along with the
main matter.
(Vidya Negi) (Sarita Purohit)
Branch Officer AR-cum-PS

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MCS MAHARASHTRA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY BYE LAWS 101 TO END

MCS BYE LAWS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST 101 TO END 101. If all the business on the agenda of the General Body Meeting of the Society cannot be transacted on the day on which the General Body Meeting is convened, the meeting shall be postponed to any other suitable date as may be decided by the Members present at the meeting, however not later than 30 days from the date of the meeting. 102. The Chairman of the Society shall preside over all General Body Meetings of the Society, in case if the Chairman is absent or if present and is unwilling to preside, the Members present may elect a person from amongst themselves to preside over the meeting. 103. No proxy or a holder of power of attorney or letter of authority shall be eligible to attend a General Body Meeting of the Society on behalf of a Member of the Society. 104. Voting right of a Member and the Associate Member of the Society shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 of ...
4 comments
Read more

Regulatory Labour Law Compliances and PoSH

  Management Development Program (MDP) on Regulatory Labour Law Compliance • Chetana’s Institute of Management and Research (CIMR) organized a Management Development Program (MDP) on Regulatory Labour Law Compliance for Industrial Relations/Employee Relations Officers and HR Managers. The two-day program was held on December 10th and 11th, 2024. The MDP aimed to enhance participants' knowledge and practical application of labour law compliance and related tools. The program attracted nominations from five prominent manufacturing companies in Mumbai and Thane. Thus, the participants were senior officers responsible for compliance matters and 15 HR students from CIMR. Program Highlights • Dr. Madhumita Patil, CEO of CIMR and CRKIMR, inaugurated the program, emphasizing the importance of compliance to protect the workforce. • Mr. Vijay Padate, a distinguished expert and former Director of the Employer Federation of India, as well as a former member of EPFO and ESIC, provided a compre...
12 comments
Read more

PoSH Act: ICC of the Employer of the Complainant (Victim) is also empowered to conduct enquiry -Path-breaking Ruling by the Hon'ble Supreme Court

 KEY POINTS BY LAWSHASTRA - FULL JUDGEMENT APPENDED BELOW   This path-breaking judgement by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, has well enunciated the objectives of the VISHAKA Guidelines and the PoSH Act, while spelling out the jurisdictional aspects of the “Employer” Crystal clear.  Precisely, the jurisdictional challenge by the Appellant in the present case, inter alia relates to whether the Internal Complaints Committee (hereinafter referred to as “ICC”) constituted at a certain Department of the Government of India can entertain a complaint under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “POSH Act”) against the Appellant who was working at a different Department of the Government of India at the relevant time.  Key Points for reference   PoSH Act. (extracts) Section 2(a)  “(a) “aggrieved woman” means -  in relation to a workplace, a woman, of any age whether employed or n...
Post a Comment
Read more